Archive

Archive for the ‘Public Education’ Category

Public School’s Reporting

May 15th, 2010 sandyo No comments
The May 14, Boston Globe article, “We Need It, but Who’ll Pay for a Longer School Day?” by Scot Lehigh, engages once again in reporting and editorializing which belittles and denies the rights of educators to just decisions on their working conditions.
The misinterpretation of research on charter and public schools is absolutely unconscionable and occurs over and over in the Globe. The paper needs to be called to account for such behavior and hear loud and clear that in this city and this state the bottom line must be honest information and balanced reporting.
There are many points to be disputed in this article but the worst seems to be that Mr. Lehigh believes that the teachers in the most challenged schools in the city should voluntarily give up their rights to fair compensation for their work and instead work for free for the equivalent of more than 62 additional days.
Ann O’Halloran, CPS Board Member, Legislative Chair, retired teacher
Categories: Public Education Tags:

Response to Governor’s Charter School Interest

August 11th, 2009 andyoram No comments

Letter submitted to the Boston Globe
With a faltering economy compounding the woes of struggling families and students (and the schools that serve them), Governor Patrick’s newfound faith in charter schools is deeply troubling (”Test scores drove charter decision,” July 17. Despite considerable hype, charters are unproven, leaky vessels that are unlikely to reach the promised land of educational excellence and equity. Worse, they divert scarce resources from schools that serve the neediest students and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future.

There is scant evidence, though much ideology, behind the notion of charter school superiority. The overall record shows charters do not outperform traditional public schools serving similar students. Moreover, some of the most highly praised charter schools lose most of their students between freshman and senior year (then claim 100% college going rates for the small fraction who remain). Where do they go? They either drop out or return to district schools.

This may produce the illusion of closing achievement gaps or “leaving no
child behind,” but now is the time for real solutions, not illusions.

Sheila Decter
Executive Director
JALSA – the Jewish Alliance for Law and Social Action